Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs Halnziye HY-910i: Comparison

3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H and Halnziye HY-910i separate most on thermal conductivity: 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H at 3 W/mK, Halnziye HY-910i at 10.5 W/mK, 71% in favour of Halnziye HY-910i.

Specs

Specification
3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H (Acrylic Pad/Non-Conductive/3 W/mK)
3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H
Halnziye HY-910i (Silicone-Based/Non-Conductive/Silver-Grey Grease/10.5 W/mK)
Halnziye HY-910i
Compound TypeAcrylic-Based Pad (non-silicone thermally conductive acrylic polymer)Silicone-Based
Brand3MHalnziye
Model5590HHalnziye HY-910i
Thermal Conductivity3 W/mK-71%10.5 W/mK
Electrical ConductivityInsulatingInsulating
Package SizeDie-cut shapes and rolls (e.g. 25.4 x 25.4 x 0.5mm squares, sold in packs)1g/3g/10g/20g syringes and jars widely offered
Recommended UseMainstream CPU/GPU and general electronics gap fillingMainstream CPU/GPU
Reapplication IntervalNo reapplication needed; self-adhesive one-time applicationNot consistently published
Safety NotesNon-conductive acrylic pad; no special handling precautions requiredNone
ConsistencyFirm, tacky acrylic polymer sheetSilver-grey grease, medium viscosity
Paste SegmentPadStandard Paste

Price comparison

Retailer3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590HHalnziye HY-910i
AmazonView on Amazon
NewarkView on Newark
HalnziyeView on Halnziye

Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

More comparisons in Thermal Paste