Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs Phobya NanoGrease Extreme: Comparison

3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H and Phobya NanoGrease Extreme separate most on thermal conductivity: 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H at 3 W/mK, Phobya NanoGrease Extreme at 16 W/mK, 81% in favour of Phobya NanoGrease Extreme.

Specs

Specification
3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H (Acrylic Pad/Non-Conductive/3 W/mK)
3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H
Phobya NanoGrease Extreme (Metal Oxide/Ceramic/Non-Conductive/16 W/mK/Screw-Cap Syringe)
Phobya NanoGrease Extreme
Compound TypeAcrylic-Based Pad (non-silicone thermally conductive acrylic polymer)Metal Oxide/Ceramic
Brand3MPhobya
Model5590HPhobya NanoGrease Extreme
Thermal Conductivity3 W/mK-81%16 W/mK
Electrical ConductivityInsulatingInsulating
Package SizeDie-cut shapes and rolls (e.g. 25.4 x 25.4 x 0.5mm squares, sold in packs)3.5g syringe with screw-cap
Recommended UseMainstream CPU/GPU and general electronics gap fillingCPU/GPU Air and Water Cooling
Reapplication IntervalNo reapplication needed; self-adhesive one-time applicationHigh viscosity (~85,000 cps) supports pump-out resistance
Safety NotesNon-conductive acrylic pad; no special handling precautions requiredNone
Paste SegmentPadStandard Paste

Price comparison

Retailer3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590HPhobya NanoGrease Extreme
AmazonView on Amazon
NewarkView on Newark

Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

More comparisons in Thermal Paste