Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs Phobya Thermal Pad XT 7W/mK: Comparison

3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H and Phobya Thermal Pad XT 7W/mK separate most on thermal conductivity: 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H at 3 W/mK, Phobya Thermal Pad XT 7W/mK at 7 W/mK, 57% in favour of Phobya Thermal Pad XT 7W/mK. They match on electrical conductivity and paste segment.

3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H (Acrylic Pad/Non-Conductive/3 W/mK)
3M3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H
Phobya Thermal Pad XT 7W/mK (Pad/Non-Conductive/100x100x1.0mm)
PhobyaPhobya Thermal Pad XT 7W/mK

Specs

Specification
3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H (Acrylic Pad/Non-Conductive/3 W/mK)
3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H
Phobya Thermal Pad XT 7W/mK (Pad/Non-Conductive/100x100x1.0mm)
Phobya Thermal Pad XT 7W/mK
Brand3MPhobya
Model5590HPhobya Thermal Pad XT 7W/mk
Thermal Conductivity3 W/mK-57%7 W/mK
Electrical ConductivityInsulatingInsulating
Package SizeDie-cut shapes and rolls (e.g. 25.4 x 25.4 x 0.5mm squares, sold in packs)100 x 100 x 1.0mm sheet, cuttable to size; also sold in other thicknesses
Recommended UseMainstream CPU/GPU and general electronics gap fillingMainstream CPU/GPU; Phobya markets it as able to match high-end thermal compounds for VRAM, VRM, and North/Southbridge cooling
ConsistencyFirm, tacky acrylic polymer sheetVery flexible, low-hardness pad that adapts to uneven surfaces at low contact pressure; slightly sticky surface under a removable protective foil
Paste SegmentPadPad

Price comparison

Retailer3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590HPhobya Thermal Pad XT 7W/mK
AmazonView on Amazon
NewarkView on Newark
NeweggView on Newegg

Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

More comparisons in Thermal Paste