Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Akasa AK-450 Silver Compound 450 vs Parker Chomerics THERM-A-GAP PAD 80: Comparison
Akasa AK-450 Silver Compound 450 and Parker Chomerics THERM-A-GAP PAD 80 separate most on thermal conductivity: Akasa AK-450 Silver Compound 450 at 9.24 W/mK, Parker Chomerics THERM-A-GAP PAD 80 at 8.3 W/mK, 10% in favour of Akasa AK-450 Silver Compound 450.
Specs
| Specification |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Akasa | Parker Chomerics |
| Model | AK-450-5G | THERM-A-GAP PAD 80 |
| Thermal Conductivity | 9.24 W/mK | 8.3 W/mK-10% |
| Package Size | 5g syringe | Sheet form, cut to size, multiple thicknesses |
| Recommended Use | Mainstream CPU/GPU (formulated for CPU/heatsink interfaces) | High-end CPU/GPU and general electronics gap filling |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Pad |
Price comparison
| Retailer | Akasa AK-450 Silver Compound 450 | Parker Chomerics THERM-A-GAP PAD 80 |
|---|---|---|
| Akasa | View on Akasa | |
| Amazon UK | View on Amazon UK | |
| DigiKey | View on DigiKey | |
| Sealing Devices (Datasheet) | View on Sealing Devices (Datasheet) |
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Alphacool Eisfrost Xtreme Liquid Metal Thermal Paste vs Parker Chomerics THERM-A-GAP PAD 80
- Arctic MX-5 vs Parker Chomerics THERM-A-GAP PAD 80
- 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs Akasa AK-450 Silver Compound 450 vs Akasa AK-455
- 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs Parker Chomerics THERM-A-GAP PAD 80
- Alphacool Apex 2 Thermal Paste vs Parker Chomerics THERM-A-GAP PAD 80
- Akasa AK-450 Silver Compound 450 vs StarTech.com StarTech SILV5-THERMAL-PASTE