Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Noctua NT-H1: Comparison
Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK and Noctua NT-H1 separate most on thermal conductivity: Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK at 17.8 W/mK, Noctua NT-H1 at 12.8 W/mK, 28% in favour of Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK.
Specs
| Specification | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Compound Type | Silicone-Based Pad | Metal-Oxide (no metallic particles) |
| Brand | Alphacool | Noctua |
| Model | Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK | Noctua NT-H1 , NT-H1 |
| Thermal Conductivity | 17.8 W/mK | 12.8 W/mK-28% |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Insulating |
| Package Size | 120 x 20 x 1.5mm sheet | 3.5g / 10g tubes |
| Recommended Use | High-end CPU/GPU | Mainstream CPU/GPU, High-end CPU/GPU (Noctua's original flagship paste, superseded by NT-H2) |
| Paste Segment | Pad | Standard Paste |
Price comparison
| Retailer | Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK | Noctua NT-H1 |
|---|---|---|
| Alphacool Shop (EU) | View on Alphacool Shop (EU) |
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Arctic MX-4 vs Corsair TM30 vs Noctua NT-H1
- Arctic MX-7 vs Noctua NT-H1
- Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK vs Noctua NT-H1
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut Extreme
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond




