Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs PCCooler EX90: Comparison
Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs PCCooler EX90 viscosity compared
Viscosity is the dividing line, Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK 0 Pa-s against PCCooler EX90 Gray, includes scraper tool. There is a split on density as well, 3.5 g/cm3 on the Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK versus 2.6 g/cm3 on the PCCooler EX90. There is a split on paste segment as well, Pad on the Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK versus Standard Paste on the PCCooler EX90.
Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs PCCooler EX90: which one fits your build
Take the Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK for high-end CPU/GPU, VRM/MOSFET, and memory-module cooling wanting the highest independently-measured W/mK figure among this catalog's pads. It is equally the pick for builds needing a documented electrical safety spec sheet (volume resistance, dielectric breakdown) rather than a generic non-conductive claim. Avoid it for buyers who specifically want Eisschicht's softer, more paste-like conforming fit for delicate uneven surfaces. The PCCooler EX90 suits overclockers and high-TDP builds wanting PCCooler's flagship-tier number. It is not the one for buyers who want a paste with a longer independent review history, TFX or Kryonaut are more established. Our rating of the Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK (6.8/10): A soft, high-conductivity pad aimed at high-end builds, though it lacks the independent review base of the paste side of Alphacool's lineup. Our rating of the PCCooler EX90 (7/10): PCCooler's flagship compound offers strong published numbers, though it lacks the independent review base of bigger brands.
Where the two are identical
The common ground is wider than the gap: electrical conductivity and recommended use are identical here.
Specs and benchmarks
Brand
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK
- Alphacool
- PCCooler EX90
- PCCooler
Model
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK
- PCCooler EX90
- PCCooler EX90
Electrical Conductivity
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK
- Insulating
- PCCooler EX90
- Insulating
Package Size
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK
- 120 x 20 x 1.5mm sheet
- PCCooler EX90
- 4g tube
Recommended Use
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK
- High-end CPU/GPU
- PCCooler EX90
- High-end CPU/GPU
Viscosity
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK
- 0 Pa-s
- PCCooler EX90
- Gray, includes scraper tool
Density
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK
- 3.5 g/cm3
- PCCooler EX90
- 2.6 g/cm3
Paste Segment
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK
- Pad
- PCCooler EX90
- Standard Paste
Which one should you pick?
Choose Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK if you already have it on hand or find it at a lower price.
Choose PCCooler EX90 if you already have it on hand or find it at a lower price.
Price comparison
| Retailer | Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK | PCCooler EX90 |
|---|---|---|
| Alphacool Shop (EU) | View on Alphacool Shop (EU) |
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.
Verdict
Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK
6.8 / 10 Expert Rating
A soft, high-conductivity pad aimed at high-end builds, though it lacks the independent review base of the paste side of Alphacool's lineup.
PCCooler EX90
7 / 10 Expert Rating
PCCooler's flagship compound offers strong published numbers, though it lacks the independent review base of bigger brands.
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Noctua NT-H1
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Noctua NT-H2
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Honeywell PTM7950
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Arctic TP-4
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Bergquist (Henkel) Bergquist Gap Pad 2500S20




