Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Alphacool Subzero vs Phobya Thermal Pad Ultra 5W/mK: Comparison
Alphacool Subzero and Phobya Thermal Pad Ultra 5W/mK separate most on thermal conductivity: Alphacool Subzero at 16 W/mK, Phobya Thermal Pad Ultra 5W/mK at 5 W/mK, 69% in favour of Alphacool Subzero.
Specs
| Specification | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Alphacool | Phobya |
| Model | Alphacool Subzero , Subzero | Phobya Thermal Pad Ultra 5W/mk |
| Thermal Conductivity | 16 W/mK | 5 W/mK-69% |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Insulating |
| Package Size | 1g / 3.5g / 20g tubes | 15 x 15 x 4mm, sold as a single piece; also available in other sizes up to 120x20mm strips |
| Recommended Use | High-end CPU/GPU (including overclocking) | Mainstream CPU/GPU; Phobya also markets it for VRAM, VRM, and North/Southbridge cooling |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Pad |
Price comparison
| Retailer | Alphacool Subzero | Phobya Thermal Pad Ultra 5W/mK |
|---|---|---|
| Performance-PCs | View on Performance-PCs | |
| Newegg | View on Newegg |
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Alphacool Subzero vs Arctic MX-4
- Arctic MX-4 vs Phobya Thermal Pad Ultra 5W/mK
- Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK vs Phobya Thermal Pad Ultra 5W/mK
- Arctic MX-5 vs Phobya Thermal Pad Ultra 5W/mK
- Alphacool Subzero vs ID-Cooling ID-TG15
- Alphacool Eisfrost Xtreme Liquid Metal Thermal Paste vs Phobya Thermal Pad Ultra 5W/mK




