Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Arctic MX-1 vs Fujipoly Extreme X-e Thermal Pad: Comparison
Arctic MX-1 vs Fujipoly Extreme X-e Thermal Pad: the recommended use difference
Recommended use is the dividing line, Arctic MX-1 Mainstream CPU/GPU against Fujipoly Extreme X-e Thermal Pad GPU Backplate/VRM Cooling, Chassis Heatsink Mounting. There is a split on paste segment as well, Standard Paste on the Arctic MX-1 versus Pad on the Fujipoly Extreme X-e Thermal Pad.
Who each one is for
The Arctic MX-1 is the one to take for retro/vintage PC builders restoring an early-2000s Arctic Cooling Freezer setup and historical reference on Arctic's MX lineage, though it is the wrong buy for buyers needing a modern, independently benchmarked paste. It is not the one for any current-generation CPU or GPU - superseded by MX-2 through MX-7 with two decades of formula improvements. Buy the Fujipoly Extreme X-e Thermal Pad for GPU backplate/VRM cooling and chassis heatsink mounting in case-mod builds, though it is not the pick for standard CPU IHS-to-cooler applications where a conventional paste is simpler. It is equally the pick for builders wanting a widely-used, cuttable universal filler pad with documented conductivity. Avoid it for applications needing the highest possible pad conductivity, where PrimoChill's XR-m rates higher. Our rating of the Arctic MX-1 (4.8/10): A legacy compound originally bundled with older Arctic Cooling coolers; Arctic no longer publishes current specifications for it, so treat it as a dated, no-longer-current option. Our rating of the Fujipoly Extreme X-e Thermal Pad (7/10): A cuttable universal filler pad from a respected industrial thermal-materials brand.
What Arctic MX-1 and Fujipoly Extreme X-e Thermal Pad have in common
The common ground is wider than the gap: electrical conductivity are identical here.
Specs and benchmarks
Electrical Conductivity
- Arctic MX-1
- Insulating
- Fujipoly Extreme X-e Thermal Pad
- Insulating
Recommended Use
- Arctic MX-1
- Mainstream CPU/GPU (originally bundled with Arctic Cooling Freezer 4/7/64 and Accelero coolers, rated for all AMD and Intel platforms of its era)
- Fujipoly Extreme X-e Thermal Pad
- GPU Backplate/VRM Cooling, Chassis Heatsink Mounting
Safety Notes
- Arctic MX-1
- Contains no metal particles - electrically non-conductive and non-capacitive
- Fujipoly Extreme X-e Thermal Pad
- None
Paste Segment
- Arctic MX-1
- Standard Paste
- Fujipoly Extreme X-e Thermal Pad
- Pad
Which one should you pick?
Choose Arctic MX-1 if you already have it on hand or find it at a lower price.
Choose Fujipoly Extreme X-e Thermal Pad if you already have it on hand or find it at a lower price.
Price comparison
| Retailer | Arctic MX-1 | Fujipoly Extreme X-e Thermal Pad |
|---|---|---|
| Newegg | View on Newegg | |
| Amazon | View on Amazon |
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.
Verdict
Arctic MX-1
4.8 / 10 Expert Rating
A legacy compound originally bundled with older Arctic Cooling coolers; Arctic no longer publishes current specifications for it, so treat it as a dated, no-longer-current option.
Fujipoly Extreme X-e Thermal Pad
7 / 10 Expert Rating
A cuttable universal filler pad from a respected industrial thermal-materials brand.