Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

Arctic MX-1 vs Fujipoly Extreme X-e Thermal Pad: Comparison

Arctic MX-1 and Fujipoly Extreme X-e Thermal Pad differ on recommended use: Arctic MX-1 at Mainstream CPU/GPU (originally bundled with Arctic Cooling Freezer 4/7/64 and Accelero coolers, rated for all AMD and Intel platforms of its era), Fujipoly Extreme X-e Thermal Pad at GPU Backplate/VRM Cooling, Chassis Heatsink Mounting.

Specs

Specification
Arctic MX-1 (Legacy Non-Conductive Paste, Original Arctic Cooling Freezer-Series Bundle Compound)
Arctic MX-1
Fujipoly Extreme X-e Thermal Pad (Silicone-Based Pad/Non-Conductive/11.0 W/mK/Cuttable Universal Filler)
Fujipoly Extreme X-e Thermal Pad
Electrical ConductivityInsulatingInsulating
Recommended UseMainstream CPU/GPU (originally bundled with Arctic Cooling Freezer 4/7/64 and Accelero coolers, rated for all AMD and Intel platforms of its era)GPU Backplate/VRM Cooling, Chassis Heatsink Mounting
Safety NotesContains no metal particles - electrically non-conductive and non-capacitiveNone
Paste SegmentStandard PastePad

Price comparison

RetailerArctic MX-1Fujipoly Extreme X-e Thermal Pad
NeweggView on Newegg

Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

More comparisons in Thermal Paste