Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

Arctic MX-7 vs Fujipoly Extreme X-e Thermal Pad: Comparison

Arctic MX-7 vs Fujipoly Extreme X-e Thermal Pad recommended use compared

The first real difference is recommended use: Arctic MX-7 Mainstream CPU/GPU, High-end CPU/GPU against Fujipoly Extreme X-e Thermal Pad GPU Backplate/VRM Cooling, Chassis Heatsink Mounting. There is a split on paste segment as well, Standard Paste on the Arctic MX-7 versus Pad on the Fujipoly Extreme X-e Thermal Pad.

Which should you buy, Arctic MX-7 or Fujipoly Extreme X-e Thermal Pad?

The Arctic MX-7 is the one to take for MX-4 and MX-6 users wanting Arctic's newest formula and builds with exposed SMD components near the die, though it is not the pick for buyers who want a published W/mK figure to compare and anyone who prefers spreading paste with a spatula. The same goes for GPU, console and laptop repastes where pump-out is the main concern. Buy the Fujipoly Extreme X-e Thermal Pad for GPU backplate/VRM cooling and chassis heatsink mounting in case-mod builds, though it is not built for standard CPU IHS-to-cooler applications where a conventional paste is simpler. It also earns its place with builders wanting a widely-used, cuttable universal filler pad with documented conductivity. Avoid it for applications needing the highest possible pad conductivity, where PrimoChill's XR-m rates higher. Our rating of the Arctic MX-7 (8.7/10): Arctic's newest flagship compound, positioned as a genuine step up over MX-6 for enthusiasts chasing the last few degrees. Our rating of the Fujipoly Extreme X-e Thermal Pad (7/10): A cuttable universal filler pad from a respected industrial thermal-materials brand.

What Arctic MX-7 and Fujipoly Extreme X-e Thermal Pad have in common

The common ground is wider than the gap: electrical conductivity are identical here.

Specs and benchmarks

  • Electrical Conductivity

    Arctic MX-7
    Insulating
    Fujipoly Extreme X-e Thermal Pad
    Insulating
  • Package Size

    Arctic MX-7
    2g, 4g, 8g tubes; 4g also sold bundled with 6x MX Cleaner wipes
    Fujipoly Extreme X-e Thermal Pad
    100x15mm and similar sheets, multiple thicknesses
  • Recommended Use

    Arctic MX-7
    Mainstream CPU/GPU, High-end CPU/GPU (marketed for CPUs, GPUs, consoles and laptops)
    Fujipoly Extreme X-e Thermal Pad
    GPU Backplate/VRM Cooling, Chassis Heatsink Mounting
  • Safety Notes

    Arctic MX-7
    Non-conductive and non-capacitive; volume resistivity 1.7x10^12 ohm-cm, breakdown voltage 4.2 kV/mm
    Fujipoly Extreme X-e Thermal Pad
    None
  • Paste Segment

    Arctic MX-7
    Standard Paste
    Fujipoly Extreme X-e Thermal Pad
    Pad

    Which one should you pick?

    Choose Arctic MX-7 if you already have it on hand or find it at a lower price.

    Choose Fujipoly Extreme X-e Thermal Pad if you already have it on hand or find it at a lower price.

    Price comparison

    RetailerArctic MX-7Fujipoly Extreme X-e Thermal Pad
    Arctic StoreView on Arctic Store
    AmazonView on AmazonView on Amazon
    Best BuyView on Best Buy

    Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

    Verdict

    Arctic MX-7

    8.7 / 10 Expert Rating

    Arctic's newest flagship compound, positioned as a genuine step up over MX-6 for enthusiasts chasing the last few degrees.

    Fujipoly Extreme X-e Thermal Pad

    7 / 10 Expert Rating

    A cuttable universal filler pad from a respected industrial thermal-materials brand.

    More comparisons in Thermal Paste