Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Arctic MX-6 vs Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut: Comparison
What is the difference between Arctic MX-6 and Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut?
They are built to different briefs, and compound type shows it, Arctic MX-6 Carbon-Based against Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut Liquid Metal.
Which should you buy, Arctic MX-6 or Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut?
Take the Arctic MX-6 for the overwhelming majority of builders, from first-time PC builders to enthusiasts. This is genuinely the recommended default across nearly every current buying guide. It also earns its place with anyone who wants to avoid repasting for years. The 8+ year rated longevity and pump-out resistance genuinely reduce long-term maintenance. It is the wrong buy for extreme overclockers chasing the absolute lowest possible temperature regardless of cost. Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut, covered elsewhere on this site, or liquid metal compounds for experienced users only, sit above this on raw conductivity. Take the Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut for experienced overclockers working with delidded CPUs or direct-die cooling. This is specifically the use case liquid metal is built for and where its conductivity advantage genuinely matters. It is equally the pick for builders who fully understand and accept the electrical short-circuit and aluminum-corrosion risks. This product demands real technical confidence, not just a willingness to follow instructions once. It is not the one for GPU application under any circumstances. Every current guide is specific and unanimous on this point given how closely packed GPU components are. Our rating of the Arctic MX-6 (8.6/10): A widely recommended default pick that balances near-flagship performance with excellent long-term durability and a low price.
Read the full breakdown: Thermal Paste vs Thermal Pad vs Liquid Metal: Which One to Use
Frequently asked questions
Do the Arctic MX-6 and Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut differ on electrical conductivity?
Yes. Electrical Conductivity reads Insulating on the Arctic MX-6 versus Conductive on the Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut.
Is the Min Operating Temperature the same on the Arctic MX-6 and Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut?
It is. Both are listed at -50 C, so it is not a reason to pick one over the other.
Specs and benchmarks
Brand
- Arctic MX-6
- Arctic
- Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut
- Thermal Grizzly
Compound Type
- Arctic MX-6
- Carbon-Based
- Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut
- Liquid Metal
Model
- Arctic MX-6
- Arctic MX-6 , MX-6
- Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut
- Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut , Conductonaut
Electrical Conductivity
- Arctic MX-6
- Insulating
- Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut
- Conductive
Package Size
- Arctic MX-6
- 2g / 4g / 8g tubes
- Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut
- 1g / 5g syringe
Recommended Use
- Arctic MX-6
- Mainstream CPU/GPU, High-end CPU/GPU (mainstream to upper-mid builds)
- Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut
- Delidded-Direct-Die (experienced builders only)
Reapplication Interval
- Arctic MX-6
- 8+ years
- Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut
- Long-lasting but requires careful reapplication
Safety Notes
- Arctic MX-6
- Neither electrically conductive nor capacitive; free of liquid metal components; volume resistivity 1.8x10^12 ohm-cm, breakdown voltage 7.5 kV/mm
- Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut
- Electrically conductive; must not be used with aluminium coolers or brought into contact with aluminium
Viscosity
- Arctic MX-6
- 4500 Pa-s
- Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut
- 0.0021 Pa-s
Pump-Out Resistance
- Arctic MX-6
- High
- Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut
- High
Min Operating Temperature
- Arctic MX-6
- -50 C
- Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut
- -50 C
Max Operating Temperature
- Arctic MX-6
- 150 CBest
- Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut
- 200 C
Density
- Arctic MX-6
- 2.6 g/cm3
- Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut
- 6.24 g/cm3
Paste Segment
- Arctic MX-6
- Standard Paste
- Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut
- Liquid Metal
Which one should you pick?
Choose Arctic MX-6 if you already have it on hand or find it at a lower price.
Choose Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut if you already have it on hand or find it at a lower price.
Price comparison
| Retailer | Arctic MX-6 | Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut |
|---|---|---|
| Amazon | View on Amazon | View on Amazon |
| Newegg | View on Newegg |
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.
Verdict
Arctic MX-6
8.6 / 10 Expert Rating
A widely recommended default pick that balances near-flagship performance with excellent long-term durability and a low price.
Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut
9 / 10 Expert Rating
The benchmark liquid-metal compound for extreme cooling performance, but strictly for experienced builders comfortable with the short-circuit risk.