Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Arctic MX-7 vs Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut: Comparison
Arctic MX-7 and Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut differ on electrical conductivity: Arctic MX-7 at Insulating, Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut at Conductive (short-circuit risk).
Specs
| Specification |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Conductive (short-circuit risk) |
| Package Size | 2g, 4g, 8g tubes; 4g also sold bundled with 6x MX Cleaner wipes | 1g syringe |
| Recommended Use | Mainstream CPU/GPU, High-end CPU/GPU (marketed for CPUs, GPUs, consoles and laptops) | Delidded-Direct-Die (experienced builders only) |
| Safety Notes | Non-conductive and non-capacitive; volume resistivity 1.7x10^12 ohm-cm, breakdown voltage 4.2 kV/mm | Reacts with aluminum; do not use on bare aluminum coldplates or near exposed components |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Liquid Metal |
Price comparison
| Retailer | Arctic MX-7 | Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut |
|---|---|---|
| Arctic Store | View on Arctic Store | |
| Amazon | View on Amazon | |
| Best Buy | View on Best Buy |
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Arctic MX-7 vs Noctua NT-H1
- 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut
- Arctic MX-7 vs EK Thermal PAD G 2.0mm
- Arctic MX-7 vs Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Extreme
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Arctic MX-7
- Alphacool Apex 2 Thermal Paste vs Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut