Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Acer Nitro XV320QU vs ASUS ZenScreen Fold OLED MQ17QH: Comparison
Acer Nitro XV320QU and ASUS ZenScreen Fold OLED MQ17QH separate most on refresh rate: Acer Nitro XV320QU at 170 Hz, ASUS ZenScreen Fold OLED MQ17QH at 60 Hz, 65% in favour of Acer Nitro XV320QU.
Specs
| Specification |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Panel Type | IPS | OLED |
| Brand | Acer | ASUS |
| Model Number | XV320QU | MQ17QH |
| Screen Size | 32 | 17.3 in-46% |
| Resolution | 2560 x 1440 (QHD) | 2560 x 1920 |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Refresh Rate | 170 Hz | 60 Hz-65% |
| Response Time | 1ms (VRB) | 0.2 ms |
| Adaptive Sync | AMD FreeSync Premium, G-Sync Compatible | None |
| Series | Nitro | ZenScreen Fold OLED MQ17QH |
| Color Gamut | ~95%+ DCI-P3 | 100% DCI-P3 |
Verdict
Acer Nitro XV320QU
7.8 / 10 Expert Rating
A practical, larger-format value gaming monitor whose built-in KVM switch adds real convenience for dual-PC users.
ASUS ZenScreen Fold OLED MQ17QH
7.8 / 10 Expert Rating
A genuinely novel, well-executed foldable OLED display, but it's a niche luxury purchase, not a mainstream portable monitor recommendation.