Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
AOC 24G2 vs ASUS ZenScreen Fold OLED MQ17QH: Comparison
AOC 24G2 vs ASUS ZenScreen Fold OLED MQ17QH: the refresh rate difference
The gap that matters here is refresh rate: AOC 24G2 144 Hz against ASUS ZenScreen Fold OLED MQ17QH 60 Hz, which puts AOC 24G2 58% ahead. Add max refresh rate to that, 144 Hz on the AOC 24G2 versus 60 Hz on the ASUS ZenScreen Fold OLED MQ17QH, and the pattern holds. Add screen size to that, 23.8 in on the AOC 24G2 versus 17.3 in on the ASUS ZenScreen Fold OLED MQ17QH, and the pattern holds.
Who each one is for
The AOC 24G2 is the one to take for extremely budget-conscious gamers wanting a fully adjustable ergonomic stand, though it is not the pick for buyers wanting wide-gamut color coverage or HDR support and competitive players wanting higher refresh rates than 144Hz. The same goes for first-time gaming monitor buyers looking for a well-reviewed, dependable budget option. The ASUS ZenScreen Fold OLED MQ17QH suits buyers who want a laptop-replacement foldable OLED workstation and early adopters willing to pay for genuinely new display tech, though it is the wrong buy for anyone on a budget looking for a simple second screen and users who need a true widescreen aspect ratio without letterboxing. It is equally the pick for professionals who present or review media and want a premium single-panel fold. Our rating of the ASUS ZenScreen Fold OLED MQ17QH (7.8/10): A genuinely novel, well-executed foldable OLED display, but it's a niche luxury purchase, not a mainstream portable monitor recommendation.
Frequently asked questions
Do the AOC 24G2 and ASUS ZenScreen Fold OLED MQ17QH differ on resolution?
Yes. Resolution reads 1920 x 1080 on the AOC 24G2 versus 2560 x 1920 on the ASUS ZenScreen Fold OLED MQ17QH.
Is the Curved the same on the AOC 24G2 and ASUS ZenScreen Fold OLED MQ17QH?
It is. Both are listed at No, so it is not a reason to pick one over the other.
Specs and benchmarks
Panel Type
- AOC 24G2
- IPS
- ASUS ZenScreen Fold OLED MQ17QH
- OLED
Brand
- AOC 24G2
- AOC
- ASUS ZenScreen Fold OLED MQ17QH
- ASUS
Model Number
- AOC 24G2
- 24G2
- ASUS ZenScreen Fold OLED MQ17QH
- MQ17QH
Screen Size
- AOC 24G2
- 23.8 inBest
- ASUS ZenScreen Fold OLED MQ17QH
- 17.3 in-27%
Resolution
- AOC 24G2
- 1920 x 1080 (Full HD)
- ASUS ZenScreen Fold OLED MQ17QH
- 2560 x 1920
Aspect Ratio
- AOC 24G2
- 16:9
- ASUS ZenScreen Fold OLED MQ17QH
- 4:3
Refresh Rate
- AOC 24G2
- 144 HzBest
- ASUS ZenScreen Fold OLED MQ17QH
- 60 Hz-58%
Adaptive Sync
- AOC 24G2
- AMD FreeSync, G-Sync Compatible
- ASUS ZenScreen Fold OLED MQ17QH
- None
HDR Support
- AOC 24G2
- No
- ASUS ZenScreen Fold OLED MQ17QH
- Yes
Curved
- AOC 24G2
- No
- ASUS ZenScreen Fold OLED MQ17QH
- No
Panel Coating
- AOC 24G2
- Matte anti-glare
- ASUS ZenScreen Fold OLED MQ17QH
- Glossy
Screen Curvature
- AOC 24G2
- Flat
- ASUS ZenScreen Fold OLED MQ17QH
- Flat
Max Refresh Rate
- AOC 24G2
- 144 HzBest
- ASUS ZenScreen Fold OLED MQ17QH
- 60 Hz-58%
SDR Brightness
- AOC 24G2
- 250 nits
- ASUS ZenScreen Fold OLED MQ17QH
- 350 nitsBest
Color Depth
- AOC 24G2
- 6-bit + FRC
- ASUS ZenScreen Fold OLED MQ17QH
- 10-bit
Built-in Speakers
- AOC 24G2
- No
- ASUS ZenScreen Fold OLED MQ17QH
- No
Series
- AOC 24G2
- 24G2
- ASUS ZenScreen Fold OLED MQ17QH
- ZenScreen Fold OLED MQ17QH
Color Gamut
- AOC 24G2
- 100% sRGB
- ASUS ZenScreen Fold OLED MQ17QH
- 100% DCI-P3
Which one should you pick?
Choose AOC 24G2 if you want the higher screen size (23.8 in vs 17.3 in), the higher refresh rate (144 Hz vs 60 Hz) and the higher max refresh rate (144 Hz vs 60 Hz).
Choose ASUS ZenScreen Fold OLED MQ17QH if you already have it on hand or find it at a lower price.
Price comparison
| Retailer | AOC 24G2 | ASUS ZenScreen Fold OLED MQ17QH |
|---|---|---|
| Amazon | View on Amazon |
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.
Verdict
ASUS ZenScreen Fold OLED MQ17QH
7.8 / 10 Expert Rating
A genuinely novel, well-executed foldable OLED display, but it's a niche luxury purchase, not a mainstream portable monitor recommendation.