Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

Intel Core Ultra 7 265T vs Intel Processor 300: Comparison

Core Ultra 7 265T vs Processor 300 l3 cache compared

L3 cache is where these two genuinely part company, Core Ultra 7 265T 30 MB against Processor 300 6 MB, a 80% lead for Core Ultra 7 265T. There is a split on p-core boost clock as well, 5.3 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 265T versus 4.0 GHz on the Processor 300. There is a split on p-core base clock as well, 1.5 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 265T versus 3.9 GHz on the Processor 300. They differ on tdp too, 35 W on the Core Ultra 7 265T versus 65 W on the Processor 300. There is a split on socket as well, FCLGA1851 on the Core Ultra 7 265T versus Socket 1700 on the Processor 300.

Core Ultra 7 265T vs Processor 300: which one fits your build

The Core Ultra 7 265T is the one to take for desktop gaming and everyday productivity, though it is the wrong buy for laptops and fanless designs. Buy the Processor 300 for point-of-sale systems and kiosks, though it is not the pick for gaming builds and content creation. Our rating of the Core Ultra 7 265T (8.2/10): the Intel Core Ultra 7 265T is a mainstream desktop Arrow Lake-S processor, a solid pick for everyday desktop builds. Our rating of the Processor 300 (7.3/10): the Intel Processor 300 is a minimal-core embedded desktop chip, adequate for kiosk and point-of-sale duty.

What Core Ultra 7 265T and Processor 300 have in common

The common ground is wider than the gap: integrated graphics, form factor and market segment are identical here.

Frequently asked questions

Do the Core Ultra 7 265T and Processor 300 differ on total cores?

Yes. Total Cores reads 20 on the Core Ultra 7 265T versus 2 on the Processor 300.

Specs and benchmarks

  • Form Factor

    Intel Core Ultra 7 265T
    Desktop
    Intel Processor 300
    Desktop
  • Codename

    Intel Core Ultra 7 265T
    Arrow Lake
    Intel Processor 300
    Raptor Lake
  • Release Year

    Intel Core Ultra 7 265T
    2025
    Intel Processor 300
    2024
  • TDP

    Intel Core Ultra 7 265T
    35 W
    Intel Processor 300
    65 W
  • iGPU

    Intel Core Ultra 7 265T
    Intel Graphics
    Intel Processor 300
    Intel UHD Graphics 710
  • Market Segment

    Intel Core Ultra 7 265T
    Desktop
    Intel Processor 300
    Desktop
  • Socket

    Intel Core Ultra 7 265T
    FCLGA1851
    Intel Processor 300
    Socket 1700
  • Process Node

    Intel Core Ultra 7 265T
    3 nm
    Intel Processor 300
    7 nm
  • Total Cores

    Intel Core Ultra 7 265T
    20Best
    Intel Processor 300
    2
  • Performance Cores

    Intel Core Ultra 7 265T
    8Best
    Intel Processor 300
    2
  • Efficiency Cores

    Intel Core Ultra 7 265T
    12Best
    Intel Processor 300
    0
  • Total Threads

    Intel Core Ultra 7 265T
    20Best
    Intel Processor 300
    4
  • SMT Enabled

    Intel Core Ultra 7 265T
    No
    Intel Processor 300
    Yes
  • P-Core Base Clock

    Intel Core Ultra 7 265T
    1.5 GHz
    Intel Processor 300
    3.9 GHz
  • P-Core Boost Clock

    Intel Core Ultra 7 265T
    5.3 GHz
    Intel Processor 300
    4.0 GHz
  • L3 Cache

    Intel Core Ultra 7 265T
    30 MBBest
    Intel Processor 300
    6 MB-80%
  • Base Power

    Intel Core Ultra 7 265T
    35 W
    Intel Processor 300
    46 W
  • Memory Type

    Intel Core Ultra 7 265T
    DDR5
    Intel Processor 300
    DDR5, DDR4
  • Integrated Graphics

    Intel Core Ultra 7 265T
    Yes
    Intel Processor 300
    Yes

    Which one should you pick?

    Choose Intel Core Ultra 7 265T if you want the higher L3 cache (30 MB vs 6 MB).

    Choose Intel Processor 300 if you already have it on hand or find it at a lower price.

    Verdict

    Intel Core Ultra 7 265T

    8.2 / 10 Expert Rating

    The Intel Core Ultra 7 265T is a mainstream desktop Arrow Lake-S processor, a solid pick for everyday desktop builds.

    Intel Processor 300

    7.3 / 10 Expert Rating

    The Intel Processor 300 is a minimal-core embedded desktop chip, adequate for kiosk and point-of-sale duty.

    More comparisons in Processors (CPUs)