Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

Acer FA300 vs Crucial BX500: Comparison

Acer FA300 vs Crucial BX500 sequential read compared

On sequential read the spread is 95%, Acer FA300 11000 MB/s against Crucial BX500 540 MB/s, so Acer FA300 takes it. Acer FA300 also leads on sequential write, 10000 MB/s on the Acer FA300 versus 500 MB/s on the Crucial BX500. They differ on bus interface too, PCIe 5.0 x4 on the Acer FA300 versus SATA III on the Crucial BX500. There is a split on nand type as well, TLC on the Acer FA300 versus TLC/QLC , DRAM-Less on the Crucial BX500. They differ on form factor too, M.2 2280 on the Acer FA300 versus 2.5-inch on the Crucial BX500.

Acer FA300 vs Crucial BX500: which one fits your build

Buy the Crucial BX500 for basic hard-drive-to-SSD upgrades and budget office PCs, though it is not the pick for heavy multitasking or gaming rigs and buyers wanting the MX500's DRAM cache. Our rating of the Crucial BX500 (6.8/10): A rock-bottom budget SATA drive; the DRAM-less design keeps costs low but limits sustained performance.

Where the two are identical

The common ground is wider than the gap: drive type are identical here.

Specs and benchmarks

  • Speed Score

    Acer FA300
    8.5/10
    Crucial BX500
    –

    Internal and portable SSDs are scored on separate scales, so these two scores can't be compared directly.

  • Brand

    Acer FA300
    Acer
    Crucial BX500
    Crucial (Micron)
  • Model Number

    Acer FA300
    Acer FA300
    Crucial BX500
    BX500
  • Series

    Acer FA300
    FA300
    Crucial BX500
    BX500
  • Drive Type

    Acer FA300
    Internal
    Crucial BX500
    Internal
  • Bus Interface

    Acer FA300
    PCIe 5.0 x4
    Crucial BX500
    SATA III (6Gb/s)
  • Form Factor

    Acer FA300
    M.2 2280
    Crucial BX500
    2.5-inch
  • Sequential Read

    Acer FA300
    11000 MB/s
    Crucial BX500
    540 MB/s-95%
  • Sequential Write

    Acer FA300
    10000 MB/s
    Crucial BX500
    500 MB/s-95%
  • DRAM Cache

    Acer FA300
    DRAM-less (HMB)
    Crucial BX500
    DRAM-less
  • NAND Type

    Acer FA300
    TLC
    Crucial BX500
    TLC/QLC (Varies by Capacity), DRAM-Less

    Which one should you pick?

    Choose Acer FA300 if you want the higher sequential read (11000 MB/s vs 540 MB/s) and the higher sequential write (10000 MB/s vs 500 MB/s).

    Choose Crucial BX500 if you already have it on hand or find it at a lower price.

    Price comparison

    RetailerAcer FA300Crucial BX500
    AmazonView on AmazonView on Amazon
    NeweggView on Newegg

    Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

    Verdict

    Crucial BX500

    6.8 / 10 Expert Rating

    A rock-bottom budget SATA drive; the DRAM-less design keeps costs low but limits sustained performance.

    Compare Acer FA300 with