Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Acer FA300 vs Seagate FireCuda 510: Comparison
Acer FA300 vs Seagate FireCuda 510 sequential read compared
The gap that matters here is sequential read: Acer FA300 11000 MB/s against Seagate FireCuda 510 3450 MB/s, which puts Acer FA300 69% ahead. Measured rather than claimed: in Speed Score the Acer FA300 returns 8.5 against 7.1, a 16% lead. Acer FA300 also leads on sequential write, 10000 MB/s on the Acer FA300 versus 3200 MB/s on the Seagate FireCuda 510. There is a split on bus interface as well, PCIe 5.0 x4 on the Acer FA300 versus PCIe 3.0 x4, NVMe on the Seagate FireCuda 510. Dram cache is not the same on both, DRAM-less on the Acer FA300 versus DRAM on the Seagate FireCuda 510.
Who each one is for
Take the Seagate FireCuda 510 for owners of older PCIe 3.0-only motherboards who can't use a Gen 4 drive's extra bandwidth anyway. The 510 maxes out what that interface can deliver. The same goes for bargain hunters who find genuine clearance stock priced meaningfully below current Gen 4 alternatives. It is the wrong buy for anyone with a PCIe 4.0-capable motherboard. The Seagate FireCuda 530, also covered on this site, roughly doubles the bandwidth for comparable money. Our rating of the Seagate FireCuda 510 (6.4/10): A capable PCIe 3.0 drive that's been surpassed by Seagate's own newer lineup; only worth it as genuine clearance stock.
Where the two are identical
The common ground is wider than the gap: nand type, form factor and drive type are identical here.
Specs and benchmarks
Speed Score
- Acer FA300
- 8.5/10Best
- Seagate FireCuda 510
- 7.1/10-16%
How fast this drive is, rated from its read and write speeds, cache and NAND type. 10 is the fastest.
Brand
- Acer FA300
- Acer
- Seagate FireCuda 510
- Seagate
Model Number
- Acer FA300
- Acer FA300
- Seagate FireCuda 510
- FireCuda 510
Series
- Acer FA300
- FA300
- Seagate FireCuda 510
- FireCuda 510
Drive Type
- Acer FA300
- Internal
- Seagate FireCuda 510
- Internal
Bus Interface
- Acer FA300
- PCIe 5.0 x4
- Seagate FireCuda 510
- PCIe 3.0 x4, NVMe
Form Factor
- Acer FA300
- M.2 2280
- Seagate FireCuda 510
- M.2 2280
Sequential Read
- Acer FA300
- 11000 MB/s
- Seagate FireCuda 510
- 3450 MB/s-69%
Sequential Write
- Acer FA300
- 10000 MB/s
- Seagate FireCuda 510
- 3200 MB/s-68%
DRAM Cache
- Acer FA300
- DRAM-less (HMB)
- Seagate FireCuda 510
- DRAM
NAND Type
- Acer FA300
- TLC
- Seagate FireCuda 510
- TLC
Which one should you pick?
Choose Acer FA300 if you want the higher speed score (8.5 vs 7.1), the higher sequential read (11000 MB/s vs 3450 MB/s) and the higher sequential write (10000 MB/s vs 3200 MB/s).
Choose Seagate FireCuda 510 if you already have it on hand or find it at a lower price.
Price comparison
| Retailer | Acer FA300 | Seagate FireCuda 510 |
|---|---|---|
| Amazon | View on Amazon |
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.
Verdict
Seagate FireCuda 510
6.4 / 10 Expert Rating
A capable PCIe 3.0 drive that's been surpassed by Seagate's own newer lineup; only worth it as genuine clearance stock.