Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs EK Thermal PAD F 1.5mm: Comparison

3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H and EK Thermal PAD F 1.5mm separate most on thermal conductivity: 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H at 3 W/mK, EK Thermal PAD F 1.5mm at 3.5 W/mK, 14% in favour of EK Thermal PAD F 1.5mm. They match on electrical conductivity and paste segment.

Specs

Specification
3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H (Acrylic Pad/Non-Conductive/3 W/mK)
3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H
EK Thermal PAD F 1.5mm (120x16mm) (Aluminum-Oxide/Metal-Oxide/Non-Conductive/Reusable Water Block Replacement Pad)
EK Thermal PAD F 1.5mm
Thermal Conductivity3 W/mK-14%3.5 W/mK
Electrical ConductivityInsulatingInsulating
Package SizeDie-cut shapes and rolls (e.g. 25.4 x 25.4 x 0.5mm squares, sold in packs)Type F, 120 x 16 x 1.5mm
Recommended UseMainstream CPU/GPU and general electronics gap fillingHigh-end CPU/GPU (replacement pad for EK full-cover water blocks)
Safety NotesNon-conductive acrylic pad; no special handling precautions requiredFlame rating V-0; dielectric breakdown voltage >4kV; volume resistance >10^11 Ohm-m; natural tack on one side only, remove protective foil before installation
ConsistencyFirm, tacky acrylic polymer sheetHardness 5 (Shore A); 100% elongation; reworkable/reusable
Paste SegmentPadPad

Price comparison

Retailer3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590HEK Thermal PAD F 1.5mm
AmazonView on Amazon
NewarkView on Newark
Titan RigView on Titan Rig

Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

More comparisons in Thermal Paste