Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs JunPus JP-DX1: Comparison

What is the difference between 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface and JunPus JP-DX1?

Expect a near tie. The closest thing to a difference is thermal conductivity, 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface 2.08 W/mK against JunPus JP-DX1 16 W/mK max. There is a split on viscosity as well, Firm, tacky acrylic polymer sheet on the 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface versus Viscosity 3,000,000 mPa.s , per JunPus; very stiff grey... on the JunPus JP-DX1. There is a split on recommended use as well, Battery cooling, power electronics and HMI displays on the 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface versus High-end CPU/GPU on the JunPus JP-DX1. They differ on conductivity source too, https://multimedia.3m.com/mws/media/920112O/3m-thermally-conductive-acrylic-interface-pad-5590h-technical-data-sheet.pdf on the 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface versus https://www.thermal-paste.com/products/nano-diamond-thermal-paste/jp-dx1.html on the JunPus JP-DX1. They differ on paste segment too, Pad on the 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface versus Standard Paste on the JunPus JP-DX1.

Who each one is for

The 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface suits silicone-sensitive assemblies near optics, displays or connectors and power electronics and battery gap filling, though it is not built for high-end GPU memory or VRM cooling. It is the wrong buy for builds where silicone pads are acceptable and higher conductivity is wanted. The JunPus JP-DX1 is the one to take for experienced builders who want a diamond-filled paste and CPU repastes with high mounting pressure, though it is the wrong buy for first-time builders who want an easy spread and buyers who need a published operating temperature range. Our rating of the 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface (6.6/10): an industrial acrylic interface pad from an established materials manufacturer, aimed at OEM and repair use rather than enthusiast builds. Our rating of the JunPus JP-DX1 (6.5/10): JunPus's original nano-diamond overclocking grease, also sold in bulk for system builders, with the same limited independent review coverage as its successor.

What 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface and JunPus JP-DX1 have in common

The common ground is wider than the gap: electrical conductivity are identical here.

Specs and benchmarks

  • Brand

    3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H
    3M
    JunPus JP-DX1
    JunPus
  • Model

    3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H
    5590H
    JunPus JP-DX1
    JP-DX1
  • Thermal Conductivity

    3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H
    2.08 W/mK (ASTM D5470)
    JunPus JP-DX1
    16 W/mK maxBest
  • Electrical Conductivity

    3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H
    Insulating
    JunPus JP-DX1
    Insulating
  • Package Size

    3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H
    Sheets and die-cut shapes, 0.5/1.0/1.2/1.5/2.0mm thick
    JunPus JP-DX1
    1g, 20g, 30g or 50g
  • Recommended Use

    3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H
    Battery cooling, power electronics and HMI displays (general electronics gap filling)
    JunPus JP-DX1
    High-end CPU/GPU
  • Conductivity Source

    3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H
    https://multimedia.3m.com/mws/media/920112O/3m-thermally-conductive-acrylic-interface-pad-5590h-technical-data-sheet.pdf
    JunPus JP-DX1
    https://www.thermal-paste.com/products/nano-diamond-thermal-paste/jp-dx1.html
  • Viscosity

    3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H
    Firm, tacky acrylic polymer sheet
    JunPus JP-DX1
    Viscosity 3,000,000 mPa.s (3,000 Pa-s), per JunPus; very stiff grey grease
  • Paste Segment

    3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H
    Pad
    JunPus JP-DX1
    Standard Paste

    Which one should you pick?

    Choose 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H if you already have it on hand or find it at a lower price.

    Choose JunPus JP-DX1 if you want the higher thermal conductivity (16 W/mK max vs 2.08 W/mK (ASTM D5470)).

    Price comparison

    Retailer3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590HJunPus JP-DX1
    AmazonView on AmazonView on Amazon
    NewarkView on Newark
    NeweggView on Newegg

    Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

    Verdict

    3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H

    6.6 / 10 Expert Rating

    An industrial acrylic interface pad from an established materials manufacturer, aimed at OEM and repair use rather than enthusiast builds.

    JunPus JP-DX1

    6.5 / 10 Expert Rating

    JunPus's original nano-diamond overclocking grease, also sold in bulk for system builders, with the same limited independent review coverage as its successor.

    More comparisons in Thermal Paste