Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs PCCooler EX90: Comparison
3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H and PCCooler EX90 separate most on thermal conductivity: 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H at 3 W/mK, PCCooler EX90 at 14.8 W/mK, 80% in favour of PCCooler EX90.
Specs
| Specification |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | 3M | PCCooler |
| Model | 5590H | PCCooler EX90 |
| Thermal Conductivity | 3 W/mK-80% | 14.8 W/mK |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Insulating |
| Package Size | Die-cut shapes and rolls (e.g. 25.4 x 25.4 x 0.5mm squares, sold in packs) | 4g tube |
| Recommended Use | Mainstream CPU/GPU and general electronics gap filling | High-end CPU/GPU |
| Consistency | Firm, tacky acrylic polymer sheet | Gray, includes scraper tool |
| Paste Segment | Pad | Standard Paste |
Price comparison
| Retailer | 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H | PCCooler EX90 |
|---|---|---|
| Amazon | View on Amazon | |
| Newark | View on Newark |
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs StarTech.com StarTech SILV5-THERMAL-PASTE
- 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs EK-Quantum Vector³ RTX 5080/90 Thermal Pad Kit
- 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs Thermalright Extreme Odyssey 85x45mm Pad
- 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs CS Labs (Computer Systems, Greece) CS Labs K5-Pro
- 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut
- 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs Akasa AK-450 Silver Compound 450 vs Akasa AK-455