Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs Zalman ZM-STC10: Comparison
3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H and Zalman ZM-STC10 separate most on thermal conductivity: 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H at 3 W/mK, Zalman ZM-STC10 at 11.5 W/mK, 74% in favour of Zalman ZM-STC10.
Specs
| Specification |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | 3M | Zalman |
| Model | 5590H | ZM-STC10 |
| Thermal Conductivity | 3 W/mK-74% | 11.5 W/mK |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Insulating |
| Package Size | Die-cut shapes and rolls (e.g. 25.4 x 25.4 x 0.5mm squares, sold in packs) | 2g syringe (110 x 23 x 14mm) |
| Recommended Use | Mainstream CPU/GPU and general electronics gap filling | Mainstream CPU/GPU |
| Paste Segment | Pad | Standard Paste |
Price comparison
| Retailer | 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H | Zalman ZM-STC10 |
|---|---|---|
| Amazon | View on Amazon | |
| Newark | View on Newark | |
| Zalman | View on Zalman | |
| Aquatuning | View on Aquatuning |
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs StarTech.com StarTech SILV5-THERMAL-PASTE
- 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs Thermalright Extreme Odyssey 85x45mm Pad
- Alphacool Apex 2 Thermal Paste vs Zalman ZM-STC10
- 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs CS Labs (Computer Systems, Greece) CS Labs K5-Pro
- 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs EK-Quantum Vector³ RTX 5080/90 Thermal Pad Kit
- 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut