Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Alphacool Apex 2 Thermal Paste vs Parker Chomerics THERM-A-GAP PAD 80: Comparison
Alphacool Apex 2 Thermal Paste vs Parker Chomerics THERM-A-GAP PAD 80 thermal conductivity compared
The gap that matters here is thermal conductivity: Alphacool Apex 2 Thermal Paste 6.7 W/mK against Parker Chomerics THERM-A-GAP PAD 80 8.3 W/mK, which puts Parker Chomerics THERM-A-GAP PAD 80 19% ahead. They differ on viscosity too, 130 Pa-s on the Alphacool Apex 2 Thermal Paste versus Soft, compressible silicone elastomer sheet on the Parker Chomerics THERM-A-GAP PAD 80. There is a split on recommended use as well, High-end CPU/GPU on the Alphacool Apex 2 Thermal Paste versus High-end CPU/GPU and general electronics gap filling on the Parker Chomerics THERM-A-GAP PAD 80. Conductivity source is not the same on both, https://shop.alphacool.com/en/detail/index/sArticle/22025 on the Alphacool Apex 2 Thermal Paste versus https://ph.parker.com/us/en/product-list/therm-a-gap-pad-80-thermally-conductive-gap-filler-pads on the Parker Chomerics THERM-A-GAP PAD 80. They differ on paste segment too, Standard Paste on the Alphacool Apex 2 Thermal Paste versus Pad on the Parker Chomerics THERM-A-GAP PAD 80.
Who each one is for
it is not built for buyers who specifically want liquid-metal-level conductivity. It also earns its place with high-end CPU and GPU builds, overclocking rigs, workstations and servers wanting Alphacool's current-generation paste. It is not the one for anyone needing a confirmed silicone/carbon base disclosure, which Alphacool has not published for this formula. The Parker Chomerics THERM-A-GAP PAD 80 is the one to take for high-power component gap filling and high-end CPU/GPU, though it is not the pick for budget-conscious low-power builds. Our rating of the Alphacool Apex 2 Thermal Paste (6.7/10): A high-end Alphacool paste with a solid published conductivity figure, though independent review coverage is thinner than bigger paste-specialist brands. Our rating of the Parker Chomerics THERM-A-GAP PAD 80 (6.8/10): an industrial-grade gap pad from Parker Chomerics, reliable but aimed more at OEM and industrial use than PC building.
Where the two are identical
Where they agree, they agree completely, electrical conductivity included, so the decision does not turn on any of those.
Specs and benchmarks
Brand
- Alphacool Apex 2 Thermal Paste
- Alphacool
- Parker Chomerics THERM-A-GAP PAD 80
- Parker Chomerics
Model
- Alphacool Apex 2 Thermal Paste
- Alphacool Apex 2
- Parker Chomerics THERM-A-GAP PAD 80
- THERM-A-GAP PAD 80
Thermal Conductivity
- Alphacool Apex 2 Thermal Paste
- 6.7 W/mK-19%
- Parker Chomerics THERM-A-GAP PAD 80
- 8.3 W/mKBest
Electrical Conductivity
- Alphacool Apex 2 Thermal Paste
- Insulating
- Parker Chomerics THERM-A-GAP PAD 80
- Insulating
Package Size
- Alphacool Apex 2 Thermal Paste
- 2g syringe
- Parker Chomerics THERM-A-GAP PAD 80
- Sheet form, cut to size, multiple thicknesses
Recommended Use
- Alphacool Apex 2 Thermal Paste
- High-end CPU/GPU (developed with Halnziye for CPUs, GPU hotspots, overclocking systems, workstations and servers)
- Parker Chomerics THERM-A-GAP PAD 80
- High-end CPU/GPU and general electronics gap filling
Safety Notes
- Alphacool Apex 2 Thermal Paste
- Causes serious eye irritation; toxic to aquatic life with long-lasting effects. Wear protective gloves and eye protection and wash hands thoroughly after use.
- Parker Chomerics THERM-A-GAP PAD 80
- Non-conductive silicone pad; no special handling precautions required
Conductivity Source
- Alphacool Apex 2 Thermal Paste
- https://shop.alphacool.com/en/detail/index/sArticle/22025
- Parker Chomerics THERM-A-GAP PAD 80
- https://ph.parker.com/us/en/product-list/therm-a-gap-pad-80-thermally-conductive-gap-filler-pads
Viscosity
- Alphacool Apex 2 Thermal Paste
- 130 Pa-s
- Parker Chomerics THERM-A-GAP PAD 80
- Soft, compressible silicone elastomer sheet
Paste Segment
- Alphacool Apex 2 Thermal Paste
- Standard Paste
- Parker Chomerics THERM-A-GAP PAD 80
- Pad
Which one should you pick?
Choose Alphacool Apex 2 Thermal Paste if you already have it on hand or find it at a lower price.
Choose Parker Chomerics THERM-A-GAP PAD 80 if you want the higher thermal conductivity (8.3 W/mK vs 6.7 W/mK).
Price comparison
| Retailer | Alphacool Apex 2 Thermal Paste | Parker Chomerics THERM-A-GAP PAD 80 |
|---|---|---|
| Alphacool Shop (EU) | View on Alphacool Shop (EU) | |
| DigiKey | View on DigiKey |
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.
Verdict
Alphacool Apex 2 Thermal Paste
6.7 / 10 Expert Rating
A high-end Alphacool paste with a solid published conductivity figure, though independent review coverage is thinner than bigger paste-specialist brands.
Parker Chomerics THERM-A-GAP PAD 80
6.8 / 10 Expert Rating
An industrial-grade gap pad from Parker Chomerics, reliable but aimed more at OEM and industrial use than PC building.
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Alphacool Apex 2 Thermal Paste vs Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Pro
- Alphacool Apex 2 Thermal Paste vs ID-Cooling Frost X45
- Alphacool Apex 2 Thermal Paste vs Noctua NT-H1
- Alphacool Apex 2 Thermal Paste vs ID-Cooling Frost X25
- Alphacool Apex 2 Thermal Paste vs Zalman ZM-STC10
- Alphacool Apex 2 Thermal Paste vs Arctic TP-4