Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Alphacool Apex 2 Thermal Paste vs Parker Chomerics THERM-A-GAP PAD 80: Comparison
Alphacool Apex 2 Thermal Paste and Parker Chomerics THERM-A-GAP PAD 80 separate most on thermal conductivity: Alphacool Apex 2 Thermal Paste at 6.7 W/mK, Parker Chomerics THERM-A-GAP PAD 80 at 8.3 W/mK, 19% in favour of Parker Chomerics THERM-A-GAP PAD 80.
Specs
| Specification |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Alphacool | Parker Chomerics |
| Model | Alphacool Apex 2 | THERM-A-GAP PAD 80 |
| Thermal Conductivity | 6.7 W/mK-19% | 8.3 W/mK |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Insulating |
| Package Size | 2g syringe | Sheet form, cut to size, multiple thicknesses |
| Recommended Use | High-end CPU/GPU (developed with Halnziye for CPUs, GPU hotspots, overclocking systems, workstations and servers) | High-end CPU/GPU and general electronics gap filling |
| Safety Notes | Causes serious eye irritation; toxic to aquatic life with long-lasting effects. Wear protective gloves and eye protection and wash hands thoroughly after use. | Non-conductive silicone pad; no special handling precautions required |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Pad |
Price comparison
| Retailer | Alphacool Apex 2 Thermal Paste | Parker Chomerics THERM-A-GAP PAD 80 |
|---|---|---|
| Alphacool Shop (EU) | View on Alphacool Shop (EU) | |
| DigiKey | View on DigiKey | |
| Sealing Devices (Datasheet) | View on Sealing Devices (Datasheet) |
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Alphacool Apex 2 Thermal Paste vs ID-Cooling Frost X45
- Alphacool Apex 2 Thermal Paste vs Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Pro
- Alphacool Apex 2 Thermal Paste vs Zalman ZM-STC10
- Alphacool Apex 2 Thermal Paste vs Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut
- Alphacool Apex 2 Thermal Paste vs Halnziye HY-880
- Alphacool Apex 2 Thermal Paste vs ID-Cooling Frost X25