Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Alphacool Apex 2 Thermal Paste vs Noctua NT-H1: Comparison
Alphacool Apex 2 Thermal Paste and Noctua NT-H1 separate most on thermal conductivity: Alphacool Apex 2 Thermal Paste at 6.7 W/mK, Noctua NT-H1 at 12.8 W/mK, 48% in favour of Noctua NT-H1. They match on electrical conductivity and paste segment.
Specs
| Specification |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Alphacool | Noctua |
| Model | Alphacool Apex 2 | Noctua NT-H1 , NT-H1 |
| Thermal Conductivity | 6.7 W/mK-48% | 12.8 W/mK |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Insulating |
| Package Size | 2g syringe | 3.5g / 10g tubes |
| Recommended Use | High-end CPU/GPU (developed with Halnziye for CPUs, GPU hotspots, overclocking systems, workstations and servers) | Mainstream CPU/GPU, High-end CPU/GPU (Noctua's original flagship paste, superseded by NT-H2) |
| Safety Notes | Causes serious eye irritation; toxic to aquatic life with long-lasting effects. Wear protective gloves and eye protection and wash hands thoroughly after use. | None |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Standard Paste |
Price comparison
| Retailer | Alphacool Apex 2 Thermal Paste | Noctua NT-H1 |
|---|---|---|
| Alphacool Shop (EU) | View on Alphacool Shop (EU) |
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Arctic MX-4 vs Corsair TM30 vs Noctua NT-H1
- Arctic MX-7 vs Noctua NT-H1
- Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK vs Noctua NT-H1
- Alphacool Apex 2 Thermal Paste vs ID-Cooling Frost X45
- Alphacool Apex 2 Thermal Paste vs Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Pro
- Alphacool Apex 2 Thermal Paste vs Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut