Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Deepcool G40: Comparison
Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK and Deepcool G40 separate most on thermal conductivity: Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK at 17.8 W/mK, Deepcool G40 at 5.2 W/mK, 71% in favour of Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK. They match on electrical conductivity and min operating temp.
Specs
| Specification | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Thermal Conductivity | 17.8 W/mK | 5.2 W/mK-71% |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Insulating |
| Package Size | 120 x 20 x 1.5mm sheet | 4 g grease weight (16 g net weight incl. syringe) |
| Recommended Use | High-end CPU/GPU | High-end CPU/GPU (marketed for the overclocking community and extreme gamers) |
| Density | 3.5 g/cm3 | 2.6 g/cm3 |
| Material | Silicone, ultra-soft with high compressibility | Silicone-Based (Deepcool describes it as an "organosilicon material" using nanotechnology) |
| Operating Temperature | -50 to +150 °C | -50°C to +240°C |
| Paste Segment | Pad | Standard Paste |
| Min Operating Temp | -50 C | -50 C |
| Max Operating Temp | 150 C | 240 C |
Price comparison
| Retailer | Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK | Deepcool G40 |
|---|---|---|
| Alphacool Shop (EU) | View on Alphacool Shop (EU) |
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut Extreme
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Noctua NT-H2
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Noctua NT-H1
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Deepcool G15




