Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

Arctic MX-7 vs PrimoChill Ultra Extreme XR-m Thermal Pad: Comparison

Arctic MX-7 and PrimoChill Ultra Extreme XR-m Thermal Pad differ on recommended use: Arctic MX-7 at Mainstream CPU/GPU, High-end CPU/GPU (marketed for CPUs, GPUs, consoles and laptops), PrimoChill Ultra Extreme XR-m Thermal Pad at GPU VRM/MOSFET Cooling, Case-Mod Builds.

Specs

Specification
Arctic MX-7 (Carbon-Based/Non-Conductive/ULTIMATE Performance Successor to MX-6)
Arctic MX-7
PrimoChill Ultra Extreme XR-m Thermal Pad (Silicone-Based Pad/Non-Conductive/17.0 W/mK/Cuttable Sheet)
PrimoChill Ultra Extreme XR-m Thermal Pad
Electrical ConductivityInsulatingInsulating
Package Size2g, 4g, 8g tubes; 4g also sold bundled with 6x MX Cleaner wipes60x50mm sheets, multiple thicknesses
Recommended UseMainstream CPU/GPU, High-end CPU/GPU (marketed for CPUs, GPUs, consoles and laptops)GPU VRM/MOSFET Cooling, Case-Mod Builds
Safety NotesNon-conductive and non-capacitive; volume resistivity 1.7x10^12 ohm-cm, breakdown voltage 4.2 kV/mmNone
Paste SegmentStandard PastePad

Price comparison

RetailerArctic MX-7PrimoChill Ultra Extreme XR-m Thermal Pad
Arctic StoreView on Arctic Store
AmazonView on Amazon
Best BuyView on Best Buy

Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

More comparisons in Thermal Paste